|
|
|
|
|
Abolitionism
Jesusi.com
|
|
Serfdom
|
³ó³ëÁ¦µµ
|
|
|
|
serfdom,
condition in medieval Europe in which a tenant farmer was bound to a hereditary
plot of land and to the will of his landlord. The vast majority of serfs in
medieval Europe obtained their subsistence by cultivating a plot of land that
was owned by a lord. This was the essential feature differentiating serfs from
slaves, who were bought and sold without reference to a plot of land. The serf
provided his own food and clothing from his own productive efforts. A
substantial proportion of the grain the serf grew on his holding had to be given
to his lord. The lord could also compel the serf to cultivate that portion of
the lord's land that was not held by other tenants (called demesne land). The
serf also had to use his lord's grain mills and no others. (see also slavery) |
³ó³ë (ÒÜÒ¿, serf). ¼¼½À³óÁö¿Í ¿µÁÖ¿¡ ¿¹¼ÓµÇ¾î ÀÖ´ø Áß¼¼ À¯·´ÀÇ
¼ÒÀÛ³ó¹Î½ÅºÐ.
Áß¼¼ À¯·´ÀÇ ³ó³ë ´ëºÎºÐÀº ÁöÁÖÀÇ ¶¥¿¡¼ ³ó»ç¸¦
Áö¾î »ý°è¸¦ ²Ù·Á³ª°¬´Ù. ÀÌ Á¡Àº ³ó³ëÀÇ ÁÖ¿äÆ¯Â¡À¸·Î
ÅäÁö¿Í »ó°ü¾øÀÌ »ç°í ÆÈ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´ø ³ë¿¹¿Í ±¸º°µÇ¾ú´Ù. ³ó³ë´Â
³ëµ¿À» ÅëÇØ ½º½º·Î À½½Ä°ú ÀǺ¹À» ¾ò¾úÀ¸¸ç ¼ÒÀÛÁö¿¡¼
³ª´Â °î¹° Áß »ó´ç ºÎºÐÀ» ¿µÁÖ¿¡°Ô ¹ÙÃÄ¾ß Çß´Ù. ¿µÁÖ´Â
´Ù¸¥ ¼ÒÀÛÀÎÀÌ ¸ÃÁö ¾ÊÀº ¿µÁÖ Á÷¿µÁö(demesne land)ÀÇ ÀϺθ¦ ³ó³ë¿¡°Ô
°æÀÛ½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í, ³ó³ë´Â Àڱ⠿µÁÖÀÇ ¹æ¾Ñ°£¸¸À»
ÀÌ¿ëÇØ¾ß Çß´Ù.
|
|
The essential additional mark of serfdom was the
lack of many of the personal liberties that were held by freedmen. Chief among
these was the serf's lack of freedom of movement; he could not permanently leave
his holding or his village without his lord's permission. Neither could the serf
marry, change his occupation, nor dispose of his property without his lord's
permission. He was bound to his designated plot of land and could be transferred
along with that land to a new lord. Serfs were often harshly treated and had
little legal redress against the actions of their lords. A serf could become a
freedman only through manumission, enfranchisement, or escape. |
³ó³ëÀÇ ¶Ç´Ù¸¥ ÁÖ¿äÆ¯Â¡Àº ÀÚÀ¯¹ÎÀÌ °¡Áø ÀνÅ(ìÑãó)ÀÇ
ÀÚÀ¯¸¦ ´©¸± ¼ö ¾ø¾ú´Ù´Â Á¡Àε¥ ƯÈ÷ °ÅÁÖÀÌÀüÀÇ ÀÚÀ¯°¡
¾ø¾ú´Ù. ±×µéÀº ¿µÁÖÀÇ Çã¶ôÀÌ ¾øÀ¸¸é Àڱ⠰æÀÛÁö³ª ¸¶À»À»
¿µ¿µ ¶°³¯ ¼ö ¾ø¾ú°í °áÈ¥À» ÇÒ ¼öµµ ¾ø¾úÀ¸¸ç Á÷¾÷À»
¹Ù²Ù°Å³ª Àç»êÀ» óºÐÇÏÁöµµ ¸øÇß´Ù. »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ÁöÁ¤µÈ
ÅäÁö¿¡ ¿¹¼ÓµÇ¾î ÀÖ¾î¼ ÅäÁö¿Í ´õºÒ¾î »õ·Î¿î ¿µÁÖ¿¡°Ô
³Ñ°ÜÁú ¼öµµ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. À̵éÀº Á¾Á¾ °¡È¤ÇÑ ´ë¿ì¸¦ ¹Þ¾ÒÀ¸¸ç,
¿µÁÖ¿¡°Ô ´ëÇ×ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¹ýÀû ±¸Á¦Ã¥µµ °ÅÀÇ ¾ø¾úÀ¸¹Ç·Î
Á¤½ÄÀ¸·Î ÇØ¹æµÇ°Å³ª µµ¸ÁÀ» °¡¾ß¸¸ ÀÚÀ¯¹ÎÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. |
|
From as early as the 2nd century AD,
many of the large, privately held estates in the Roman Empire that had been
worked by gangs of slaves were gradually broken up into peasant holdings. These
peasants of the late Roman Empire, many of whom were descendants of slaves, came
to depend on larger landowners and other important persons for protection from
state tax collectors and, later, from barbarian invaders and oppressive
neighbours. Some of these coloni, as the
dependent peasants were called, may have taken up holdings granted them by a
proprietor, or they may have surrendered their own lands to him in return for
such protection. In any case, it became a practice for the dependent peasant to
swear fealty to a proprietor, thus becoming bound to that lord. |
·Î¸¶ Á¦±¹¿¡¼ ³ë¿¹µéÀÌ °æÀÛÇÏ´ø ´ë±Ô¸ð »çÀ¯Áö
´ëºÎºÐÀº ÀÏÂïÀÌ 2¼¼±âºÎÅÍ Á¡Â÷ ³ó¹Î ¼ÒÀÛÁö·Î ³ª´©¾î Á³´Ù.
·Î¸¶ Á¦±¹ ¸»±âÀÇ ³ó¹ÎµéÀº ´ëºÎºÐÀÌ ³ë¿¹ÀÇ
ÈļյéÀ̾ú´Âµ¥ óÀ½¿¡´Â ¡¼¼°ü¿¡°Ô¼, ³ªÁß¿¡´Â
¾ß¸¸Á·À̳ª Æ÷¾ÇÇÑ ÀÌ¿ô¿¡°Ô¼ º¸È£¹Þ±â À§ÇØ ´õ ³ÐÀº ¶¥À»
°¡Áø ÁöÁÖ³ª ´Ù¸¥ À¯·ÂÀλçµé¿¡°Ô ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. '
Äݷδ©½º'¶ó ºÒ¸®´ø À̵é
Á¾¼Ó ³ó¹ÎÀº ÁöÁÖ¿¡°Ô ¼ÒÀÛÁö¸¦ ¹Þ¾Æ °æÀÛÇ߰ųª, º¸È£¹Þ´Â
´ë°¡·Î ÁöÁÖ¿¡°Ô ÀÚ±âµéÀÇ ³óÁö¸¦ ¹ÙÃÆ´ø °Í °°´Ù. À̵éÀº
ÁöÁÖ¿¡°Ô Ãæ¼ºÀ» ¸Í¼¼Çß°í, ÁöÁÖÀÇ ¼Ó¹ÚÀ» ¹Þ°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. |
|
The main problem with the coloni was
that of preventing them from leaving the land they had agreed to cultivate as
tenant farmers. The solution was to legally bind them to their holdings.
Accordingly, a legal code established by the Roman emperor Constantine
in 332 demanded labour services to be paid to the lord by the coloni. Although
the coloni were legally free, the conditions of fealty required them to
cultivate their lord's untenanted lands as well as their leased plot. This not
only tied them to their holdings but also made their social status essentially
servile, since the exaction of labour services required the landlord's agents to
exercise discipline over the coloni. The threat, or the exercise, of this
discipline was recognized as one of the clearest signs of a man's personal
subjection. By the 6th century AD the servi,
or serfs, as the servile peasants came to be called, were treated as an inferior
element in society. Serfs subsequently became a major class in the small,
decentralized polities that characterized most of Europe from the fall of the
Roman Empire in the 5th century to the initial reconstitution of feudal
monarchies, duchies, and counties in the 12th century. |
Äݷδ©½º¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ °¡Àå Áß¿äÇÑ ¹®Á¦´Â ±×µéÀÌ °æÀÛÇϱâ·Î
ÇÑ ³óÁö¿¡¼ ¶°³ªÁö ¸øÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ̾ú´Ù. À̸¦ À§ÇØ 332³â
·Î¸¶ ȲÁ¦ ÄܽºÅºÆ¼´©½º´Â Äݷδ©½ºµéÀ» ÁöÁÖ¿¡°Ô ³ëµ¿
ºÀ»çÇϵµ·Ï ¹ýÀ¸·Î Á¤Çß´Ù. Äݷδ©½º´Â ¹ýÀûÀ¸·Î´Â ÀÚÀ¯ÀÇ
¸öÀ̾úÁö¸¸, Ãæ¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸Í¼¼ ¶§¹®¿¡ ±×µéÀÌ ºô¸° ³óÁö»Ó¸¸
¾Æ´Ï¶ó ºô¸®Áö ¾ÊÀº ¶¥±îÁö °æÀÛÇØ¾ß Çß´Ù. °á±¹
Äݷδ©½ºµéÀº ³óÁö¿¡ ¹ÀÌ°Ô µÇ¾ú°í ÁöÁÖ °ü¸®ÀεéÀº ³ëµ¿
ºÀ»ç¸¦ ¹Þ¾Æ³»±â À§ÇØ ±×µéÀ» ÅëÁ¦ÇßÀ¸¹Ç·Î, Äݷδ©½ºµéÀÇ
»çȸÀû ÁöÀ§´Â ³ë¿¹¿Í ´Ù¸§¾ø°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. À̵éÀº 6¼¼±â¿¡
µé¾î¿Í¼ ³ë¿¹¿Í °°Àº ³ó¹ÎÀ̶õ ¶æ¿¡¼ ³ó³ë(servi, serf)¶ó
ºÒ·È°í »çȸÀûÀ¸·Î ¿µîÇÑ ´ë¿ì¸¦ ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù. 5¼¼±â ·Î¸¶
Á¦±¹ÀÌ ¸ô¶ôÇϰí 12¼¼±â ºÀ°Ç ±ºÁÖ±¹, °øÀÛ·É, ¹éÀÛ·É Àç°Ç
Ãʱâ±îÁö ´ëºÎºÐ À¯·´ ±¹°¡¿¡ ¼Ò±Ô¸ðÀÇ Áö¹æºÐ±Ç Á¤Ã¼(ïÙô÷)°¡
Çü¼ºµÇ¾ú´Âµ¥ ³ó³ë´Â ±×°÷¿¡¼ Àα¸ÀÇ ´Ù¼ö¸¦
±¸¼ºÇÏ´Â °è±ÞÀÌ µÇ¾ú´Ù. |
|
By the 14th century, economic conditions
in western Europe were favourable to the replacement of serfs by a free
peasantry. The growth of the power of central and regional governments permitted
the enforcement of peasant-landlord contracts without the need for peasant
servility, and the final abandonment of labour services on demesnes removed the
need for the direct exercise of labour discipline on the peasantry. The drastic
population decline in Europe after 1350 as a result of the Black
Death left much arable land uncultivated and also created an acute labour
shortage, both economically favourable events for the peasantry. And finally,
the endemic peasant uprisings in western Europe during the 14th and 15th
centuries also forced more favourable terms of peasant tenure. Although the new
peasants were not necessarily better off economically than were their servile
forebears, they had increased personal liberties and were no longer entirely
subject to the will of the lords whose lands they worked. |
14¼¼±â°æ ¼À¯·´ÀÇ °æÁ¦»óȲÀº ¹Ù²î¾î ³ó³ë ´ë½Å
ÀÚÀ¯³ó¹Î °è±ÞÀÌ Á¡Á¡ ´Ã¾î³µ´Ù. Áß¾Ó¡¤Áö¹æÁ¤ºÎÀÇ ¼¼·ÂÀÌ
Ä¿°¨¿¡ µû¶ó ³ó¹ÎÀº ³ó³ë°¡ µÇÁö ¾Ê°íµµ ¿µÁÖÀÇ ¶¥À»
°æÀÛÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¸¶Ä§³»´Â ¿µÁÖ Á÷¿µÁö¿¡¼ ³ëµ¿
ºÀ»ç¸¦ ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°Ô µÇ¾úÀ¸¹Ç·Î ¿µÁÖµéÀº ³ó¹Îµé¿¡°Ô ³ëµ¿À»
°¿äÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. Èæ»çº´ÀÌ ¹øÁ® 1350³â ÀÌÈÄ Àα¸°¡
Å©°Ô ÁÙ¾îµé¾î ¸Å¿ì ³ÐÀº ¶¥ÀÌ °æÀÛµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ä
¹æÄ¡µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, µ¿½Ã¿¡ ½É°¢ÇÑ ³ëµ¿·Â ºÎÁ·Çö»óÀÌ ÀϾ´Ù.
ÀÌ 2°¡Áö Çö»óÀº ¸ðµÎ ³ó¹Îµé¿¡°Ô °æÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î À¯¸®ÇϰÔ
ÀÛ¿ëÇß´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ 14~15¼¼±â ¼À¯·´ °÷°÷¿¡¼ ÀÏ¾î³ ÀæÀº
³ó¹Î¹Ý¶õ ¿ª½Ã ³ó¹ÎµéÀÇ ÅäÁöº¸À¯±ÇÀ» º¸´Ù È®°íÇϰÔ
¸¸µé¾îÁÖ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ ½Ã´ë ³ó¹ÎµéÀÌ ³ë¿¹»óÅ¿¡ ÀÖ´ø
Á¶»óµéº¸´Ù ´õ ºÎÀ¯ÇØÁø °ÍÀº ¾Æ´ÏÁö¸¸ ±×µéÀº ÀνÅÀÇ
ÀÚÀ¯±ÇÀ» ´õ ¸¹ÀÌ °¡Á³°í, ´õÀÌ»ó ¿µÁֵ鿡°Ô ¿ÏÀüÈ÷
¿¹¼ÓµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Æµµ µÇ¾ú´Ù. |
|
This favourable evolution was not shared
by the peasants of eastern Europe. Peasant conditions there in the 14th century
do not seem to have been worse than those of the west, and in some ways they
were better, because the colonization of forestlands in eastern Germany, Poland,
Bohemia, Moravia, and Hungary had led to the establishment of many free-peasant
communities. But a combination of political and economic circumstances reversed
these developments. The chief reason was that the wars that devastated eastern
Europe in the 14th and 15th centuries tended to increase the power of the
nobility at the expense of the central governments. In eastern Germany, Prussia,
Poland, and Russia, this development coincided with an increased demand for
grain from western Europe. To profit from this demand, nobles and other
landlords took back peasant holdings, expanded their own cultivation, and made
heavy demands for peasant labour services. Peasant status from eastern Germany
to Muscovy consequently deteriorated sharply. Not until the late 18th century
were the peasants of the Austro-Hungarian Empire freed from serfdom, thus
recovering their freedom of movement and marriage and the right to learn a
profession according to personal choice. The serfs of Russia
were not given their personal freedom and their own allotments of land until
Alexander II's Edict of Emancipation of 1861. |
±×·¯³ª µ¿À¯·´ ³ó¹ÎµéÀº ¼À¯·´ ³ó¹Îµé °°Àº ÇýÅÃÀ» ÀÔÁö
¸øÇß´Ù. 14¼¼±â¸¸ ÇØµµ ±×µéÀº ¼À¯·´ ³ó¹Î°ú ºñ½ÁÇÑ »óÅ¿¡
³õ¿© ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, µ¿ºÎ µ¶ÀÏ, Æú¶õµå, º¸Çì¹Ì¾Æ, ¸ð¶óºñ¾Æ,
Çë°¡¸®¿¡¼´Â »ï¸²Áö¿ª¿¡ »ç¶÷µéÀÌ Á¤ÂøÇÏ¸é¼ ÀÚÀ¯ ³ó¹Î
°øµ¿Ã¼°¡ ¸¹ÀÌ »ý°Ü³ª ¾î¶² ¸é¿¡¼´Â ¼À¯·´º¸´Ù ³´±âµµ
Çß´Ù. ±×·¯³ª 14~15¼¼±â µ¿À¯·´À» ÈÛ¾´ ÀüÀï ¶§¹®¿¡
Áß¾ÓÁ¤ºÎ°¡ ÈûÀ» ÀÒ°í ±ÍÁ·ÀÇ ±Ç·ÂÀÌ Ä¿Áö´Â µî Á¤Ä¡¡¤°æÁ¦
»óȲÀÇ º¯È´Â µ¿À¯·´ ³ó¹ÎÀÇ ÁöÀ§Çâ»óÀ» ¹æÇØÇß´Ù. ÀÌ·±
»çÅ´ ¼À¯·´ÀÇ °î¹°¼ö¿ä°¡ ´Ã¾î³ °Í°ú ¶§¸¦ ¸ÂÃß¾î µ¿ºÎ
µ¶ÀÏ, ÇÁ·ÎÀ̼¾, Æú¶õµå, ·¯½Ã¾Æ¿¡¼ ÀϾ´Ù. ±ÍÁ·µé°ú
ÁöÁÖµéÀº ¼ö¿äÁõ°¡¸¦ ƴŸ ÀÌÀÍÀ» º¸·Á°í ³ó¹Îº¸À¯Áö¸¦
µµ·Î »©¾Ñ°í ¿µÁÖ Á÷¿µÁö¸¦ ´Ã·ÈÀ¸¸ç ³ó¹Îµé¿¡°Ô °úÁßÇÑ
³ëµ¿ ºÀ»ç¸¦ ¿ä±¸Çß´Ù. ±×°á°ú µ¿ºÎ µ¶ÀÏ¿¡¼ºÎÅÍ ¸ð½ºÅ©¹Ù
´ë°ø±¹¿¡ °ÉÄ£ Áö¿ª¿¡¼ ³ó¹ÎÀÇ ÁöÀ§´Â ±Þ°ÝÈ÷ ³·¾ÆÁ³´Ù.
18¼¼±â¸»¿¡¾ß ¿À½ºÆ®¸®¾Æ-Çë°¡¸® Á¦±¹ÀÇ ³ó¹ÎµéÀº ³ó³ëÁ¦¿¡¼
Ç®·Á³ª °ÅÁÖÀÌÀü°ú °áÈ¥ÀÇ ÀÚÀ¯¸¦ ȸº¹Çϰí ÀÚ½ÅÀÇ ¼±Åÿ¡
µû¶ó Àü¹®±â¼úÀ» ¹è¿ï ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±Ç¸®¸¦ °®°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù.
·¯½Ã¾ÆÀÇ ³ó³ëµé ¿ª½Ã 1861³â ¾Ë·º»êµå¸£ 2¼¼°¡ ³ó³ëÇØ¹æ·ÉÀ»
°øÆ÷ÇÒ ¶§±îÁö ÀνÅÀÇ ÀÚÀ¯¿Í °³ÀÎÅäÁö¸¦ °®Áö ¸øÇß´Ù.
|
|
Throughout Chinese
history, land-bound peasants were considered freemen in law but depended
entirely upon the landowner for subsistence. In this system of serfdom, peasants
could be traded, punished without due process of law, and made to pay tribute to
the lord with labour. All serfs were freed, however, upon the creation of the
People's Republic of China in 1949. |
Áß±¹ÀÇ °æ¿ì ³óÅä¿¡ ¿¹¼ÓµÈ ³ó¹ÎµéÀº ¹ýÀûÀ¸·Î´Â
ÀÚÀ¯¹ÎÀ̾úÀ¸³ª ¸Ô°í »ì±â À§ÇØ ÀüÀûÀ¸·Î ÁöÁֵ鿡°Ô
ÀÇÁ¸ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ» ¼ö ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ·± ³ó³ëÁ¦µµ ¾Æ·¡ ±×µéÀº
°Å·¡´ë»óÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, Àû¹ýÇÑ ÀýÂ÷¸¦ °ÅÄ¡Áö ¾Ê°í ó¹úÀ»
¹Þ¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ÁöÁÖ¿¡°Ô ³ëµ¿À¸·Î Áö´ë(ò¢ÓÛ)¸¦ ´ë½Å ÁöºÒÇØ¾ß
Çß´Ù. ±×·¯³ª 1949³â ÁßÈÀιΰøÈ±¹ÀÌ ¼¼¿öÁø µÚ ³ó³ëµéÀº
¸ðµÎ ÇØ¹æµÇ¾ú´Ù. |
|
|
|
|
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
|
|
|
[ Ableman v. Booth ] [ Adams, John Quincy ] [ "America" - By James M Whitfield ] [ Amistad mutiny ] [ Anti-Slavery Convention Address - Angelina Grimke's ] [ American Anti-Slavery Society ] [ From David Walker's Appeal - Our Wretchedness in Consequence of Slavery ] [ Birney, James Gillespie ] [ Black Code ] [ Bleeding Kansas ] [ Brown, William Wells ] [ Brown, John ] [ Chapman, Maria Weston ] [ Child, Lydia Maria ] [ Clay, Cassius Marcellus ] [ Compromise of 1850 ] [ Crandall, Prudence ] [ Emancipation Proclamation ] [ Forced Labour ] [ Foster, Abigail Kelley ] [ freedman ] [ Freedmen's Bureau ] [ Freetown ] [ Fugitive Slave Acts ] [ gag rule ] [ Grimke, Sarah (Moore) and Angelina (Emily) ] [ From The Liberator - By William Lloyd Garrison ] [ Liberty Party ] [ Abraham Lincoln ] [ lynching ] [ The Martyr - From Uncle Tom¡¯s Cabin ] [ Middle Passage ] [ Missouri Compromise ] [ peonage ] [ personal-liberty laws ] [ On the Reception of Abolition Petitions ] [ Racism ] [ Reconstruction ] [ Serfdom ] [ Sharp, Granville ] [ Congregations Sites for the Abolitioninsts ] [ Stevens, Thaddeus ] [ Thoreau's "A Plea for Captain John Brown" ] [ Uncle Tom's Cabin and American Culture ] [ Truth, Sojourner ] [ Turner, Nat ] [ Underground Railroad ] [ Whittier, John Greenleaf ]
[ Ȩ ] [ Wiliam LLoyd Garrison ] [ Frederick Douglass ] [ The Liberator ] [ Thomas Clarkson ] [ Wilberforce, William ] [ Uncle Tom's Cabin ] [ Slavery ] [ °ü·Ã ¹®¼µé ]
|
|
|
¡¡ |
¡¡ |